ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2022 | Volume
: 11
| Issue : 1 | Page : 37 |
|
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the malocclusion impact questionnaire for patients seeking orthodontic treatment
Shoroog Agou1, Ghadir Al-Sakkaf2, Lujain Barboud2, Mustafa Elhussein3
1 Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 2 Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 3 Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ibn Sina University, Khartoum, Sudan
Correspondence Address:
Shoroog Agou Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, P. O. Box 6178, Jeddah - 21442 Saudi Arabia
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_203_21
|
|
OBJECTIVES: To assess the adaptability and validity of the Arabic version of the Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ-AR) in patients seeking orthodontic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted on a convenience sample of 77 Arabic speaking, healthy, 10–16-year-old children, selected based on their personal perception of “needing braces.”. The participants completed the MIQ-AR and the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for children aged 11–14 (CPQ11-14), answered two global questions, and had their Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need, Dental Health Component (IOTN.DHC) scores recorded. Construct validity was examined by measuring the correlation between the MIQ-AR score and the responses to the two global questions. Criterion validity was examined by measuring the correlation between the MIQ-AR and both the IOTN.DHC and CPQ11-14 scores.
RESULTS: Moderate positive correlations were observed between the MIQ-AR scores and the first (ρ = 0.320, P < 0.001) and second global questions (ρ = 0.388, P < 0.001). A strong positive correlation was found between the total CPQ11-14 and MIQ-AR scores (ρ = 0.597, P < 0.001). A positive gradient was observed between the MIQ-AR scores and IOTN.DHC scores.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the MIQ-AR is a valid tool for measuring oral health-related quality of life in patients with malocclusion, with good psychometric parameters. These preliminary findings require further testing in various settings involving a larger and more diverse sample.
|
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|