Users Online: 285
Home
About us
Editorial board
Search
Browse articles
Submit article
Instructions
Subscribe
Contacts
Login
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the left side.
All
|
Case Report
|
Case Reports
|
Editorial
|
Guest Editorial
|
Original Articles
|
Review Article
|
Short Communication
|
Systematic Review
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Original Article:
Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires
Ahmad Alobeid, Malak Hasan, Mahmoud Al-Suleiman, Tarek El-Bialy
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:137 (18 October 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.143237
Background:
Previous studies have reported on mechanical properties of different orthodontic wires. However, there is a paucity of information that comparing the mechanical properties of Blue Elgiloy (BE) when compared to stainless steel and TMA, as finishing wires as received by different companies.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of BE wires compared to stainless steel (SS) and titanium Molybdenum alloy (TMA) also known as β titanium as provided by two companies.
Materials and Methods:
Six 0.016" x 0.022"-14mm-samples of each wire were fixed individually to Instron machine and were tested in loading and unloading for three times. The initial load was set for 500 Kg at a speed of 1mm/min and displacement was adjusted for (0.5, 1mm in loading and 0.5 mm unloading at 25°C).
Statistics Analysis:
Variables were compared between groups by ANOVA test using SPSS statistical software.
Results:
BE shows comparable forces to SS when loaded 0.5 and showed decreased forces in 1mm loading compared to SS, and higher than TMA. BE also showed no forces at unloading and high deformation.
Conclusion:
BE from the two companies showed comparable mechanical properties while SS and TMA were different. The deformation of BE and its decreased forces in unloading may limit its clinical use.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (4) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Moisture insensitive primer: A myth or truth
Chandresh Shukla, Rajkumar Maurya, Upendra Jain, Ankur Gupta, Jayshree Garg
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:132 (18 October 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.143235
Objectives:
To compare the mean shear bond strength (SBS) of moisture insensitive primer (MIP) used for orthodontic bonding in the presence and absence of saliva.
Materials
and
Methods:
A total of 60 human noncarious maxillary premolars with sound buccal surfaces, recently extracted were collected in two groups of each 30. Maxillary premolar brackets were bonded to the teeth using light cure (Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) and MIP (Transbond MIP 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA,) in the presence and absence of saliva. Operators' saliva was used during the bonding under moist condition. After debonding, all the specimens were examined under a stereomicroscope (×40 magnification) for adhesive remnant using adhesive remnant index (ARI). The SBS tests were done using Instron universal testing machine at cross-head speed of 1 mm/min, force passing parallel to the buccal surface using custom rod and registered in Newtons later converted into Megapascals.
Results:
Light cure and MIP (Transbond MIP and Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) in the absence of saliva showed higher mean SBS than the presence of saliva. Group I (light cure and MIP) in the absence of saliva showed mean SBS of 9.65 ± 0.90 Mpa. Group II (light cure and MIP) with the presence of saliva showed mean SBS of 9.03 ± 1.14 Mpa. The difference between both the groups was statistically significant, as confirmed by paired
t
-test (
P
< 0.05). In-Group I, ARI scores showed that more than half of the adhesive was left over the tooth surface, and Group II showed that there was no or insignificant amount of adhesive left over the tooth surface. Chi-square test revealed significant difference in debonding characteristics among the test groups of ARI (
P
< 0.05). Failure occurred mainly in resin- bracket base and resin - adhesive interfaces (
χ
² = 10.04, df = 3,
P
= 0.031).
Conclusion:
Moisture insensitive primer is effective in the presence/absence of moisture and has shown SBS value of more than 7.8 Mpa as stated by Reynolds, hence material is suitable for clinical use.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (2) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Orthodontic bracket designs and their impact on microbial profile and periodontal disease: A clinical trial
Nikesh N Moolya, Arvind Shetty, Neha Gupta, Anvesha Gupta, Vivek Jalan, Rashmi Sharma
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:125 (18 October 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.143233
Aim:
The aim of the present study was to compare the undisturbed plaque formation on teeth bonded with Preadjusted (Captain Ortho, Libral Traders, Mumbai, India) and Begg Brackets (Captain Ortho, Libral Traders, Mumbai, India) with nonbonded control sites via a de novo plaque growth over a period of 7 days.
Materials
and
Methods:
A clinical trial with the split-mouth design was set up enrolling 10 dental students. Within each subject sites with (Preadjusted) (P-site), Begg brackets (B-site) and control sites were followed. Plaque index and gingival index were recorded on days 3 and 7. Supra-gingival and sub-gingival plaque samples were taken from the brackets and the teeth on days 3 and 7, and were sent for aerobic and anaerobic culturing. The total number of bacterial colony forming units (CFU) was assessed for each sample using a colony counter. Tukeys and Dunnett test then statistically analyzed data.
Results:
The mean plaque index and gingival index increased on P-site and B-site on the third and 7
th
day. The shift from aerobic to anaerobic species was observed earlier in P-sites than in B-sites. The CFU were significantly higher for all sites on day 7 when compared with day 3. The aerobe/anaerobe CFU ratio was significantly lower in P-sites than in B-sites and then control showing an increase in the number of anaerobic species on the 3
rd
and 7
th
day (
P
< 0.05). Based on observed means, the mean difference was significant (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusion:
The present data suggest that Preadjusted brackets accumulated more plaque than Begg brackets. Bracket design can have a significant impact on bacterial load and on periodontal parameters.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (9) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
A survey of orthodontists' perspectives on the timing of treatment: A pilot study
Eman I Al-Shayea
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:118 (18 October 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.143232
Objectives:
This study aimed to outline orthodontists' perspectives at what stage they would initiate orthodontic treatment and also sought to assess the relationship between orthodontists' views and their genders, types of practice, and experience levels.
Materials
and
Methods:
A questionnaire was sent electronically to 165 practicing orthodontists at different regions in Saudi Arabia. The orthodontists were asked to consider at what stage they would initiate orthodontic treatment for a child with one of 29 different types of occlusal deviations, functional problems, and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) listed in the questionnaire as their main orthodontic problem. Frequency distributions of all the variables were derived, and comparisons were made using the Chi-square tests.
Results:
Fifty-two electronically completed questionnaires were returned (31.5% response rate). The majority of the respondents were males (63.5%). The majority of respondents (90%) reported that they would treat most of the occlusal deviations in the mixed dentition stage. Anterior cross-bite was the most frequent indication for treatment during the early mixed dentition stage (73.7%). Conditions rated as best treated during the late mixed, or the permanent dentition stages were; overjet > 6 mm with interdental spacing, maxillary midline diastema >2 mm and deep bite >5 mm without palatal impingement. The majority of respondents (86.6%) preferred to treat most of the functional problems in the deciduous or early mixed dentition stage. Orthodontists with more than 15 years of experience preferred to treat patients with TMDs, whereas those with <15 years of experience opted to refer such patients to TMD specialists.
Conclusions:
The findings of the present study suggest that orthodontists should consider many factors, such as the risks, benefits, duration, and costs of early and late intervention, when deciding the best timing to begin orthodontic treatment.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (2) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Comparison of two three-dimensional cephalometric analysis computer software
Dena Sawchuk, Adel Alhadlaq, Thamer Alkhadra, Terry D Carlyle, Budi Kusnoto, Tarek El-Bialy
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:111 (18 October 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.143230
Background:
Three-dimensional cephalometric analyses are getting more attraction in orthodontics. The aim of this study was to compare two softwares to evaluate three-dimensional cephalometric analyses of orthodontic treatment outcomes.
Materials and Methods:
Twenty cone beam computed tomography images were obtained using i-CAT
®
imaging system from patient's records as part of their regular orthodontic records. The images were analyzed using InVivoDental5.0 (Anatomage Inc.) and 3DCeph™ (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA) software. Before and after orthodontic treatments data were analyzed using
t
-test.
Results:
Reliability test using interclass correlation coefficient was stronger for InVivoDental5.0 (0.83-0.98) compared with 3DCeph™ (0.51-0.90). Paired
t
-test comparison of the two softwares shows no statistical significant difference in the measurements made in the two softwares.
Conclusions:
InVivoDental5.0 measurements are more reproducible and user friendly when compared to 3DCeph™. No statistical difference between the two softwares in linear or angular measurements. 3DCeph™ is more time-consuming in performing three-dimensional analysis compared with InVivoDental5.0. Clinical Implications: InVivoDental5.0 utilizes less time in performing three-dimensional cephalometric measurements compared to 3DCeph™ system.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (3) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment between bidimensional and Roth straight wire techniques
Khalid H Zawawi, Ghadah A Malki
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:106 (18 October 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.143229
Objective:
The aim of this study was to compare the amount of root resorption after orthodontic treatment between the bidimensional and the Roth straight-wire techniques. Another objective was to compare the amount of root resorption in the whole sample studied and record the prevalence of root resorption.
Materials
and
Methods:
The sample consisted of 40 patients (age ranged between 11 and 18 years) with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions, treated nonextraction. Twenty patients were treated with bidimensional technique and 20 with a 0.018-inch Roth straight-wire technique. Root lengths of the maxillary incisors were measured on pre- and post-treatment periapical radiographs.
Results:
The results demonstrated that the bidimensional and Roth straight-wire groups showed significant root resorption after treatment, 1.11 (0.17) and 0.86 (0.05), respectively,
P
< 0.001. When comparing the amount of root shortening between the bidimensional and Roth straight-wire groups, there was no significant difference between the mean change from pre- to post-treatment between bidimensional group (mean = 1.00 ± 1.34) and Roth straight-wire group (mean = 0.88 ± 0.86),
P
= 0.63. Considering the whole sample, there was no root resoprtion in 32.5% of the analysed teeth. There was only mild resorption in 56.2%, moderate in 8.8% and severe in only 2.5% of the teeth.
Conclusions:
Treatment with the bidimensional technique did not produce an increase in the amount of root resorption. The prevalence and amount of root resorption was similar between bidimensional and Roth straight-wire techniques.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (4) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Review Article:
Can orthodontic relapse be blamed on the temporomandibular joint?
Larry M Wolford
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:95 (18 October 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.143227
There are many temporomandibular joint (TMJ) conditions that can cause orthodontic treatment instability and relapse. These conditions are often associated with dentofacial deformities, malocclusion, TMJ pain, headaches, myofascial pain, TMJ and jaw functional impairment, ear symptoms, etc., Many of these TMJ conditions can cause progressive and continuous changes in the occlusion and jaw relationships. Patients with these conditions may benefit from corrective orthodontic and surgical intervention. The difficulty for many clinicians may lie in identifying the presence of a TMJ condition, diagnosing the specific TMJ pathology, and selecting the proper treatment for that condition. This paper will discuss the most common TMJ pathologies that can adversely affect orthodontic stability and outcomes as well as present the treatment considerations to correct the specific TMJ conditions and associated jaw deformities to provide stable and predictable treatment results.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (4) ]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Feedback
Subscribe
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2023
April
[
11
]
March
[
24
]
2022
October
[
11
]
August
[
15
]
May
[
24
]
January
[
6
]
2021
October
[
7
]
August
[
6
]
July
[
5
]
February
[
6
]
2020
November
[
5
]
August
[
5
]
July
[
4
]
February
[
5
]
2019
October
[
4
]
August
[
5
]
May
[
5
]
February
[
5
]
2018
November
[
5
]
September
[
5
]
June
[
6
]
February
[
8
]
2017
October
[
7
]
June
[
6
]
May
[
6
]
January
[
5
]
2016
October
[
5
]
July
[
5
]
March
[
6
]
February
[
7
]
January
[
6
]
2015
July
[
7
]
April
[
4
]
January
[
6
]
2014
October
[
7
]
July
[
5
]
May
[
5
]
February
[
4
]
2013
December
[
5
]
October
[
5
]
July
[
5
]
April
[
5
]
January
[
4
]
2012
November
[
5
]
August
[
5
]
April
[
5
]
Sitemap
|
What's New
Feedback
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© Journal of Orthodontic Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 01 August, 2011