Users Online: 683
Home
About us
Editorial board
Search
Browse articles
Submit article
Instructions
Subscribe
Contacts
Login
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the left side.
All
|
Case Report
|
Case Reports
|
Editorial
|
Guest Editorial
|
Original Articles
|
Review Article
|
Short Communication
|
Systematic Review
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Original Article:
Cephalometric evaluation of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal spaces following treatment with Twin block appliance
Geeta Verma, Pradeep Tandon, Amit Nagar, Gyan P Singh, Alka Singh
J Orthodont Sci
2012, 1:77 (26 November 2012)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.103863
PMID
:24987631
Objective:
To evaluate the position of hyoid bone in the subjects treated with Twin block appliance.
Materials and Methods:
The sample consisted of 40 Angle's Class II division 1 subjects treated with Twin block appliance. Lateral radiographs were taken before and after treatment. According to Schudy's facial divergence angle (SN-MP), the subjects were classified in to three groups: group I (hypodivergent, SN-MP: <31° (27°-30°),
n=
15), group II (normodivergent, SN-MP: 31°-34°,
n=
15), and group III (hyperdivergent, SN-MP: >34° (35°-38°),
n=
10). Lateral cephalograms were traced and analyzed manually. After measurements of variables, Student's t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed.
Results:
Post treatment with Twin block therapy, hyoid bone shifted significantly (
P<
0.01) forward in horizontal dimension in all three groups, although it was highest in group III. However, there was no significant difference amongst the groups. In vertical dimension, hyoid bone shifted in upward direction in all three groups; however, the shift was significant (
P<
0.01) only in group I and there was a significant difference between group I and rest of the two groups. Width of upper airway significantly (
P
<0.01) increased and ANB angle significantly (
P<
0.001) decreased in all three groups with forward movement of mandible.
Conclusions:
After treatment with Twin block appliance, significant changes occurred in horizontal dimension (anterior displacement), which resulted in significant increase in width of upper pharynx in all three groups.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (11) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Japanese class III asymmetric patients
Talat Al-Gunaid, Masaki Yamaki, Ritsuo Takagi, Isao Saito
J Orthodont Sci
2012, 1:69 (26 November 2012)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.103865
PMID
:24987630
Objectives:
To assess the effects of bimaxillary surgery on Class III subjects with mandibular asymmetry, and to compare the effects of the type of surgery performed in the mandible on the facial profile especially in the presence of facial asymmetry.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty-six patients in whom imbalance between the maxilla and the mandible were corrected by Le Fort I osteotomy combined with bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (BIVRO group,
n
=9), bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO group,
n
=14), or a combination of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) (IVRO + SSRO group,
n
=13). Cephalograms were taken before surgery (T1), and 1 year after surgery (T2). Hard and soft-tissue changes were compared.
Results:
The postsurgical findings showed that greater mandibular backward displacement and greater upper lip forward movement were more pronounced among BIVRO group when compared with BSSRO group. Upper lip relation to E-line showed greater improvement in BIVRO group than BSSRO and IVRO + SSRO groups. The ratios of corresponding mandibular soft to hard tissue movements were higher than that of maxillary movements and were more pronounced in IVRO + SSRO and BSSRO groups when compared with BIVRO group.
Conclusion:
IVRO surgical technique appears to be more effective in positioning the mandible more posteriorly and improving upper and lower lips position and competence.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (7) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Effects of procedures of remineralization around orthodontics bracket bonded by self-etching primer on its shear bond strength
Mahmoud Al-Suleiman, Nick Silikas, David Watts
J Orthodont Sci
2012, 1:63 (26 November 2012)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.103862
PMID
:24987629
Aim:
To evaluate the effect of the application of either fluoride varnish (FV) or amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) as preventive method on shear bond strength (SBS) at the same time of their bonding
in vitro
using self-etching primer (SEP) as an agent for enamel pre-treatment FV.
Materials and Methods:
Sixty human bicuspids were randomly divided into five groups: G1 was rubbed by SEP for 5 s, G2 for 5 s by SEP and ACP, G3 for 10 s by SEP and ACP, G4 for 5 s by SEP and FV, and G5 for 10 s by SEP and FV. Stainless steel metal brackets were bonded. A Zwick/Roell Z020 Universal Testing Machine (Zwick GmbH and Co, Germany) with a 500 N load cell was used to test SBS. SBS values were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's
post hoc
tests (
P
≤0.05). Differences in adhesive remnant index (ARI) values between groups were calculated.
Results:
The mean SBS values were 10.00±4.48 MPa, 5.71±4.3 MPa, 7.47±4.44 MPa, 4.4±2.39 MPa, and 3.98±0.83 MPa for groups 1-5, respectively. Significant differences in SBS values between all groups were found. The mean SBS values of groups 2, 4, and 5 were significantly lower than that of the G1. No significant difference was found between G3 and G1. Significant difference in ARI between the groups was found (
P
<0.001) and G1 had a significantly higher ARI.
Conclusion:
The results suggested that the application of ACP at the same time of using SEP for 10 s has no effect on SBS.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (5) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Feedback
Subscribe
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2023
April
[
9
]
March
[
21
]
2022
October
[
10
]
August
[
14
]
May
[
18
]
January
[
5
]
2021
October
[
6
]
August
[
6
]
July
[
4
]
February
[
6
]
2020
November
[
5
]
August
[
5
]
July
[
3
]
February
[
5
]
2019
October
[
4
]
August
[
4
]
May
[
5
]
February
[
5
]
2018
November
[
4
]
September
[
5
]
June
[
6
]
February
[
7
]
2017
October
[
4
]
June
[
2
]
May
[
5
]
January
[
5
]
2016
October
[
5
]
July
[
3
]
March
[
5
]
February
[
5
]
January
[
6
]
2015
July
[
6
]
April
[
4
]
January
[
2
]
2014
October
[
6
]
July
[
5
]
May
[
5
]
February
[
2
]
2013
December
[
3
]
October
[
4
]
July
[
4
]
April
[
4
]
January
[
3
]
2012
November
[
3
]
August
[
3
]
April
[
2
]
Sitemap
|
What's New
Feedback
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© Journal of Orthodontic Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 01 August, 2011