Users Online: 389
Home
About us
Editorial board
Search
Browse articles
Submit article
Instructions
Subscribe
Contacts
Login
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the left side.
All
|
Case Report
|
Case Reports
|
Editorial
|
Guest Editorial
|
Original Articles
|
Review Article
|
Short Communication
|
Systematic Review
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Case Report:
Orthodontic-surgical management of an unusual dilacerated maxillary incisor
Priscilla Lu, Ming Tak Chew
J Orthodont Sci
2018, 7:24 (15 November 2018)
DOI
:10.4103/jos.JOS_80_18
PMID
:30547020
Orthodontic traction of an impacted dilacerated maxillary central incisor is clinically challenging and often results in a long treatment duration. A case of an unusual dilacerated central incisor with a 90° crown-root angulation and palatally displaced crown is presented herein. Using a single stage open window exposure of the crown on the palatal aspect with light orthodontic traction force, the impacted dilacerated central incisor crown was successfully positioned in alignment with the contralateral incisor.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (2) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns
Jamal Y Amer, Mohammad M Rayyan
J Orthodont Sci
2018, 7:23 (15 November 2018)
DOI
:10.4103/jos.JOS_154_17
PMID
:30547019
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength (SBS) between metallic orthodontic brackets and zirconia crowns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Sixty zirconia specimens were computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing milled, sintered, glazed, and embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were divided into three groups according to the surface treatment applied: C: no surface treatment (control), S: sandblasted with 50 μm Al
2
O
3
, and D: Sof-Lex disc roughening. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to the resin cement used: P: Clearfil Ceramic Primer + Panavia F2.0 (Kuraray) and R: RelyX U200 (3M/ESPE). Metallic orthodontic brackets were bonded to the labial surface of the specimens. All specimens underwent thermocycling. SBS test was applied using a universal test machine at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS:
Subgroup SP showed the highest SBS (20.8 ± 4.8 MPa), followed by subgroups SR (16.7 ± 4.6 MPa), DP (12.3 ± 2.8 MPa), and DR (11.6 ± 3 MPa). However, all specimens in the control group underwent debonding during thermocycling. The different surface treatment groups showed highly significant differences (
P
< 0.05), whereas the resin cement subgroups showed no significant differences (
P
> 0.05).
CONCLUSION:
SBS between glazed zirconia crowns and metallic brackets strongly depended on the surface treatment applied. Sandblasting achieved the highest SBS. Roughening with Sof-Lex disc proved to be a reliable surface treatment modality for glazed zirconia. Bonding to untreated glazed zirconia surfaces led to bond failure. Both resin cements yielded strong SBS results.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (7) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Treatment outcome differences between pass and fail scores and correlation between cephalometric changes and cast-radiograph evaluation of the American Board of Orthodontics
Siew Peng Neoh, Chulaluk Komoltri, Nita Viwattanatipa
J Orthodont Sci
2018, 7:22 (15 November 2018)
DOI
:10.4103/jos.JOS_33_18
PMID
:30547018
OBJECTIVE:
Using the cast-radiograph evaluation (CRE) score of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO), the purpose of this study was 1) to find the post-treatment discrepancies that contributed to low-quality outcomes and 2) to identify if there might be any correlation between cephalometric changes and post-treatment discrepancies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
About 200 records submitted for the Thai Board of Orthodontics examination were analyzed. Overall, 23 parameters of the CRE scores and 12 cephalometric changes were collected. Based on the total CRE score, the cases were classified into three categories: pass (score <20), undetermined (score 20–30), and fail (score >30). Kruskall–Wallis was used to analyze the differences of mean CRE scores among these three categories. In addition, the cases were further classified into fixed appliance, two-phase and orthognathic surgery groups. Correlation tests were carried out to determine if there might be any association between cephalometric changes and CRE parameters.
RESULTS:
Significant differences of mean CRE scores were found for all CRE components except interproximal contacts. Significant correlation coefficients with the total CRE scores were found for all parameters except interproximal contacts. Significant moderate association was found between lower incisor changes and CRE scores in the two-phase and orthognathic surgery group.
CONCLUSIONS:
In order to improve treatment outcome quality, the top four parameters that orthodontists should pay attention to are occlusal contacts, occlusal relationship, marginal ridges, and alignment and rotations. Cephalometric changes were not suitable as weighting factors for total CRE scores.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
The prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in Omani adolescent population
Laila Al Jadidi, Sharanya Sabrish, Prashantha Govinakovi Shivamurthy, Viswapurna Senguttuvan
J Orthodont Sci
2018, 7:21 (15 November 2018)
DOI
:10.4103/jos.JOS_44_18
PMID
:30547017
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in a sample of Omani adolescents aged 11–16 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The total sample included 854 adolescents with 387 boys and 467 girls between the age of 11 and 16 years with no previous orthodontic treatment history. The study design was cross-sectional. The parameters studied were skeletal relationship, lip competency, teeth impactions, missing teeth, contact point displacement, crowding, spacing, incisors and molars classification, overjet, overbite, crossbite, oral hygiene and caries. The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) was used to study the need for orthodontic treatment for the total sample.
RESULTS:
There was a high prevalence of Class I jaw relationship (86.2%). About 81.6% of the sample studied had Class I molar relationship and 73.8% had Class I incisors relationship. About 61.4% of the sample had no contact displacement, while 5.2% had contact displacement >4 mm. Severe crowding in the maxilla was found in 2.3% while spacing was found in 24.2%. Around 11% of the sample studied had Class II div 1 incisors relationship, 13.5% Class III and only 1.8% had Class II div 2 incisors relationship. Only 8.6% of the sample studied had an overjet >6 mm while 16.3% had a deep bite and 0.2% had anterior open bite of >4 mm. Teeth impaction was found in 11.7% while permanent missing teeth was present in 1.8%. The results showed that 13.9% had a very great need for treatment while 43.2% of the sample did not need any treatment.
CONCLUSION:
Among the Omani adolescents, there was a high prevalence of Class I jaw relations and Class I molar relationship. The prevalence of malocclusion and treatment need in Omanis shows some variation when compared to other ethnicities.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (6) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Effect of the application of high-frequency mechanical vibration on tooth length concurrent with orthodontic treatment using clear aligners: A retrospective study
Khaled Farouk, Thoas Shipley, Tarek El-Bialy
J Orthodont Sci
2018, 7:20 (15 November 2018)
DOI
:10.4103/jos.JOS_53_18
PMID
:30547016
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate the possible change in teeth lengths as an indicator of orthodontically induced tooth root resorption (OITRR) after high-frequency mechanical vibration (HFV) treatment concurrent with Invisalign Smart Track® aligners as evaluated by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The sample, composed of 30 patients with an average age of 26 ± 11 years and Class I malocclusion with an initial anterior crowding ranging from 3 to 5 mm, was divided equally into two groups; Group I received adjunctive high-frequency mechanical vibration (HFV); Group II, the control, did not receive adjunctive mechanical treatment. The maxillary incisor's teeth lengths were measured using Mimics software before (T1) and after (T2) treatment. All data were analyzed using Student's
t
-test. Reliability testing was completed by randomly selecting 10 patients' CBCTs, and their teeth lengths were measured twice by the same investigator over a 15-day interval and compared confirming intra-operator accuracy.
RESULTS:
The control group showed a statistically significant decrease in tooth lengths compared to the HFV group which showed nonstatistically significant change of tooth lengths.
CONCLUSION:
Patients treated with HFV showed minimum tooth length changes after treatment, which may indicate that HFV can reduce OITRR with treatment using clear aligners.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (6) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Feedback
Subscribe
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2023
April
[
11
]
March
[
24
]
2022
October
[
11
]
August
[
15
]
May
[
24
]
January
[
6
]
2021
October
[
7
]
August
[
6
]
July
[
5
]
February
[
6
]
2020
November
[
5
]
August
[
5
]
July
[
4
]
February
[
5
]
2019
October
[
4
]
August
[
5
]
May
[
5
]
February
[
5
]
2018
November
[
5
]
September
[
5
]
June
[
6
]
February
[
8
]
2017
October
[
7
]
June
[
6
]
May
[
6
]
January
[
5
]
2016
October
[
5
]
July
[
5
]
March
[
6
]
February
[
7
]
January
[
6
]
2015
July
[
7
]
April
[
4
]
January
[
6
]
2014
October
[
7
]
July
[
5
]
May
[
5
]
February
[
4
]
2013
December
[
5
]
October
[
5
]
July
[
5
]
April
[
5
]
January
[
4
]
2012
November
[
5
]
August
[
5
]
April
[
5
]
Sitemap
|
What's New
Feedback
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© Journal of Orthodontic Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 01 August, 2011