Users Online: 687
Home
About us
Editorial board
Search
Browse articles
Submit article
Instructions
Subscribe
Contacts
Login
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the left side.
All
|
Case Report
|
Case Reports
|
Editorial
|
Guest Editorial
|
Original Articles
|
Review Article
|
Short Communication
|
Systematic Review
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Original Article:
The biomechanics of Kansal Separator: A '2 in 1' self-secured orthodontic spring separator
Arun Kumar, Sudhanshu Kansal, Vimal Thareja, Gurkeerat Singh, Piush Kumar
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:12 (19 February 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.127552
PMID
:24987658
Background:
An important stage at the very beginning of orthodontic therapy is the separation of teeth where space is created for banding of the molars. A dislodged separator may create problems if ingested or it may get wedged between the adjacent teeth causing acute localized periodontitis. In order to overcome these shortcomings of conventional separators, the Kansal Separator was conceptualized. This separator has been designed as a single device that acts simultaneously on both mesial and distal aspects of tooth, causing adequate separation. In addition to separator's independent 2 in 1 action, the self-locking connecting bar prevents the premature dislodgement of the separator.
Aim:
To determine the force vectors produced by Kansal separator.
Materials and Methods:
A prototype model was created to study the forces produced.
Results:
The separator's unique design is based on sound biomechanical principles that explicate the proof of concept and allows the separator to be distinctly effective and effi cient in variable clinical situations, thus amplifying its uniqueness.
Discussion:
The Kansal Separator, a 2 in 1 orthodontic tooth separator, has a unique design enabling the device to simultaneously separate the teeth on the mesial and distal aspect of the tooth to be banded.
Conclusion:
Kansal Separator's unique design is based on sound biomechanical principles that explicate the proof of concept and allows the separator to be distinctly effective and efficient in variable clinical situations, thus amplifying its uniqueness.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (1) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Dental plaque associated with self-ligating brackets during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment: A 3-month preliminary study
Saud A Al-Anezi
J Orthodont Sci
2014, 3:7 (19 February 2014)
DOI
:10.4103/2278-0203.127550
PMID
:24987657
Background:
To compare changes in the amount and distribution of dental plaque associated with placement of elastomeric modules over a self-ligating bracket during orthodontic treatment and to relate these changes to the periodontal inflammation.
Materials and Methods:
A cross-arch randomization trial was carried out at Bristol Dental School, United Kingdom. Clinical measurements of periodontal inflammation and plaque accumulation and microbiological test were done on 24 patients aged 11-14 years [Mean (SD) age = 12.6 (1.01) years] wearing fixed appliances (Damon 2 brackets, Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) at the start and 3 months into fixed orthodontic treatment.
Results:
In the first 3 months of treatment there was no statistically significant difference in bleeding on probing between incisors with and without elastomeric modules (
P
= 0.125 and 0.508, respectively)
.
The difference in plaque accumulation was not statistically significant (
P
= 0.78). The difference in probing depths between the incisors was not statistically significant (
P
= 0.84). The microbiological analysis showed no difference.
Conclusions:
Based on this preliminary 3 months study, elastomeric modules were not significantly associated with any increased risk during treatment when compared to self-ligating brackets. The longer term studies are needed to further confirm the findings of the present study.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (5) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Feedback
Subscribe
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2023
April
[
9
]
March
[
21
]
2022
October
[
10
]
August
[
14
]
May
[
18
]
January
[
5
]
2021
October
[
6
]
August
[
6
]
July
[
4
]
February
[
6
]
2020
November
[
5
]
August
[
5
]
July
[
3
]
February
[
5
]
2019
October
[
4
]
August
[
4
]
May
[
5
]
February
[
5
]
2018
November
[
4
]
September
[
5
]
June
[
6
]
February
[
7
]
2017
October
[
4
]
June
[
2
]
May
[
5
]
January
[
5
]
2016
October
[
5
]
July
[
3
]
March
[
5
]
February
[
5
]
January
[
6
]
2015
July
[
6
]
April
[
4
]
January
[
2
]
2014
October
[
6
]
July
[
5
]
May
[
5
]
February
[
2
]
2013
December
[
3
]
October
[
4
]
July
[
4
]
April
[
4
]
January
[
3
]
2012
November
[
3
]
August
[
3
]
April
[
2
]
Sitemap
|
What's New
Feedback
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© Journal of Orthodontic Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 01 August, 2011